Now, as the litigation continues, California can finally enforce its state law, SB 822, which has been described by industry watchers as the strongest of its kind in the country and has been seen as a model for other states. The decision could also build momentum into the effort to restore net neutrality rules at the federal level.
“We’re one step closer to net neutrality being the law of the land,” said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, an activist organization.
In an unusual move, Judge John Mendez unexpectedly delivered his decision allowing the law to be enforced during a conference call involving the parties. During the hearing, it became clear the judge was not persuaded that federal law preempts states from enforcing their own net neutrality rules, according to Andrew Schwartzman, an outside attorney involved in the case who weighed in in support of California.
“He also seemed to think it was very important that internet service providers had failed to show that they face significant harm from California’s net neutrality requirements,” Schwartzman said.
In a joint statement, the cable and telecom trade groups said they would review the judge’s opinion before deciding on next steps, and called for Congress to draft a single set of net neutrality rules for the country.
“A state-by-state approach to Internet regulation will confuse consumers and deter network investment,” the groups said, “just as the importance of broadband for all has never been more apparent.”